June 9, 2014

Kon-Tiki vindicated?

Over at iSteve on The Unz Review, lots of new posts today, including one on whether a genome study has supported Thor Heyerdahl's 1947 theory/adventure.
   

4 comments:

Mount Shasta Inquirer said...

On page 87, Diamond cites DNA evidence to the contrary, as well as linguistic cultural and domestic animal evidence of Polynesian origin.

http://books.google.com/books?id=QyzHKSCYSmsC&pg=PA79&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false

Anonymous said...

OT but Noah Smith has just weighed in on Reparations: http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/reparations-sounds-too-backwards-looking.html

Anonymous said...

Why do you even bother keeping this site up? It's like having a restaurant, but once people walk in the door there's no food, only a sign saying, "EAT AT UNZ'S!".

Anonymous said...

Well, whites can go to Republican states more white than Texas but All Republicans think multicultural Houston/Harris is so great. It has the Mexican Mafia and the Latin Kings and the bloods and cripes and so forth. I pick the movement out of the high minority states to the smaller minorities states. In fact Utah doesn't have kids having so many babies anymore while Texas is number 5 in this and number one in repeat births A high Hispanic state is not that great whether its Texas or not but people end up living in the places they do anyway.